Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alibek Kachmazov vs Sheng Tang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kachmazov vs Tang analysis and find out who is favored!
Alibek Kachmazov vs Sheng Tang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kachmazov 1 - 0 Tang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kachmazov has won 48.85% of points on their second serve, while Tang has won 49.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kachmazov, in recent form, has won 49.27% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tang has won 48.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.74% and 23.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kachmazov has saved 64.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tang has saved 51.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kachmazov has won 58.57% of matches played (W/L 41/ 29), with Tang winning 41.18% (W/L 14/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kachmazov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 73/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 23/ 23). Tang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 65/ 45), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Kachmazov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58% of matches (W/L 29/ 21), where as Tang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.16% of matches (W/L 14/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kachmazov winning 1 times and Tang being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kachmazov winning 2 and Tang winning 0. The last match between Kachmazov and Tang was at the Shenzhen 1 Challenger, 11-10-2023, First, Hard with Alibek Kachmazov getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:11.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kachmazov and Tang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kachmazov winning 0 times and Tang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kachmazov winning 0, and Tang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kachmazov has played against opponents with an average rank of 284.36 while Tang has played against players with an average rank of 194.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kachmazov has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tang has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kachmazov has converted 43.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tang has converted 31.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
257
Rank
248
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
61% (170-107)
Career Total W/L
58% (76-56)
59% (17-12)
YTD W/L
43% (3-4)
$30,230
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Alibek Kachmazov | Sheng Tang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:11 | 1:21:11 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (41/66) | 67% (31/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (33/41) | 81% (25/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (15/25) | 47% (7/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (14/46) | 27% (18/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Sheng Tang
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
14 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alibek Kachmazov | Sheng Tang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (17/12) | 43% (3/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (40/30) | 43% (6/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (354/315) | 48% (64/70) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 157 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:48 | 1:24:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 217.66 | 127.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1274/2234) | 60% (248/411) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (907/1274) | 73% (181/248) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (469/960) | 50% (81/163) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (94/216) | 31% (10/32) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (871/2165) | 34% (145/421) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (14/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 50% (3/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (17/27) | 50% (3/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 20% (5/1) |
Alibek Kachmazov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Alessandro Battiston
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Adam Walton
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
22%
(
8 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Seong Chan Hong
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Luke Saville
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
11
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
James McCabe
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sheng Tang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Sheng Tang
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sheng Tang
Player
Ki Lung Ng
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Sheng Tang
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
37
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Sheng Tang
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sheng Tang
Player
Changli Zhang
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sheng Tang
Player
Jimmy Yang
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
3
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Sheng Tang
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryota Tanuma
Player
Sheng Tang
48%
(
11 of
23)
1st Serve %
72%
(
18 of
25)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
33
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Sheng Tang
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sheng Tang
Player
Hao Sheng Koay
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kachmazov Vs Tang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Alibek Kachmazov
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
